Print Article
  BookMark Article

Author Login    Author Login

Existing members will have to use the lost password facility to get new username and new password

Welcome Guest! Please login or create an account.



If you do not have an account yet, you can register ( Here ), or you may retrieve a lost user/pass ( Here ).

Navigation    Navigation

   10 newest articles RSS

Author Highlights    Featured Author

Dwayne Smith
Show Low

View My Bio & Articles

David Cartwright
White Rock

"hi. i am David."

View My Bio & Articles

Graham Stent

View My Bio & Articles

Other Websites    Websites of Interest

Why We Need Breed-Specific Legislation To Prevent Dog Attacks In Texas

Author : Paul Cannon

Current dog attack laws are inadequate to protect the public. Since the Lillian Stiles case occurred, numerous laws have been passed regarding dog bites, but they are all still inadequate to deter irresponsible dog owners from acting irresponsibly.

Lillian Stiles was an elderly lady who was drug from her riding lawnmower in her own yard by a pack of dogs and mauled to death. Public outcry demanded justice. Unfortunately, at the time, there was no criminal law allowing for jail time for an irresponsible owner of a vicious or dangerous dog. The owner walked away free.

At the time of her death, Texas law death with dog attacks mainly through civil negligence causes of action. The problem with this is that a dog owner has no civil responsibility for his dog's attack unless he 'has knowledge" that he owns a dangerous dog. Since no dog owner is dumb enough to admit their pit bull is dangerous thereby bringing responsibility upon themselves, the only way to prove the knowledge on the part of the owner, is to prove the dog had bitten before. This is what is commonly known as "the one free bite rule." The first bite gives the owner notice that he must act to prevent a second attack. Not until he fails to act to prevent the second attack, does he have responsibility under civil law. Thus, the dog and owner get one free bite.

As a result of this, the legislature rushed to pass what is known as "Lillian's Law." Unfortunately, this proved to be little more than a political move to give the appearance government was reacting to public outcry. The truth of the matter is, that law is virtually unenforceable because it requires you prove the owner acted with criminal negligence. Since the "one free bite rule" is the development of civil negligence law, Lillian's law incorporates the exact same standard of knowledge that allows dogs and their owner's one free bite under civil law. In fact, the standard is actually higher to prove criminal negligence than ordinary negligence. Thus the law does nothing to deter the first fatal attack.

States, municipalities and Counties have also enacted laws regarding dogs. Unfortunately, they also incorporate the knowledge standard-the owner must know the dog is dangerous and, once he does, he is strictly liable. Thus, just like the civil law failure, State laws make dog owners strictly liable for the second attack by a dog, but they get a free pass for the first. In some counties and cities, there are leash laws that make strict liability kick in if the dog is "at large" in public and off a leash. But these leash laws are not uniform. Some don't apply if the dog is not intentionally allowed to "run at large." If you are fortunate enough to be in a City where the leash laws are strong, you are protected if the dog attacks you outside, or off the property-depending on how it's written. If it is a weak leash law, you are out of luck. If you are in an unincorporated city, you can look to the county laws, but they typically mimic the state law-the first bite gets a free pass. Also, if the second bite is from a different dog owned by the same owner-the owner gets a pass for that dog too.

Suffice it to say, the penal laws are not deterring the conduct because they are based upon knowledge that a specific dog is dangerous due to prior conduct. I don't believe that "I didn't know my pit bull was dangerous because he hasn't bit anyone before" should ever be a defense. You can achieve this by 1) breed-specific legislation-i.e. defining certain dogs as dangerous by statute or ordinance, 2) banning the dogs that are dangerous breeds, or 3) throwing the owner in prison when their dog attacks someone regardless of the circumstances.

#1 and #2 cannot happen under current law due to the following State statute:

ยง 822.047. LOCAL REGULATION OF DANGEROUS DOGS. A county or municipality may place additional requirements or restrictions on dangerous dogs if the requirements or restrictions: ?are not specific to one breed or several breeds of dogs?

#3 will run into constitutional issues depriving someone of liberty without proof of a culpable mental state.

There are three ways to change this. 1) make all dog actions strict liability with criminal penalties regardless of knowledge of a dangerous propensity; 2) pass a law that identifies certain dog breeds as 'dangerous dogs' as a matter of law so that the owner is deemed to have knowledge that the dog is dangerous and thus, no more free bite. (breed-specific legislation), or; 3) ban the dogs that are known dangerous/vicious breeds. Since the first option is most likely unconstitutional, breed-specific legislation or breed-specific bans are the only solution.

Until the law is changed, your best bet to hold the owner responsible if you are attacked by a dangerous dog is to hire a dog bite lawyer who knows where to look with regards to state, county and municipal ordinances-for the laws-as well as county and municipality animal control divisions-for prior bite reports.

Author's Resource Box

Paul Cannon is a board certified personal injury trial lawyer in Houston, Texas who handles dog bite and dog attack cases in Texas. He graduated from South Texas College of Law in 1995 and has been licensed as an attorney in Texas since 1995. He received his Board Certification in 2005 and currently works for the law firm Simmons and Fletcher.

Article Source:

Tags:   personal injury, dog bite, dog attack, maul, houston, texas, lawyer, attorney, lillians law

Author RSS Feed   Author RSS Feed     Category RSS Feed   Category RSS Feed


  Rate This Article
Badly Written Offensive Content Spam
Bad Author Links Mis-spellings Bad Formatting
Bad Author Photo Good Article!




Submitted : 2011-07-29    Word Count : 951    Times Viewed: 1873